Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neurodegenerative disease caused by loss of motor neurons in patients with null mutations in the SMN1 gene. The almost identical SMN2 gene is unable to compensate for this deficiency because of the skipping of exon 7 during pre–messenger RNA (mRNA) processing. Although several splicing factors can modulate SMN2 splicing in vitro, the physiological regulators of this disease-causing event are unknown. We found that knockout of the splicing factor SAM68 partially rescued body weight and viability of SMAΔ7 mice. Ablation of SAM68 function promoted SMN2 splicing and expression in SMAΔ7 mice, correlating with amelioration of SMA-related defects in motor neurons and skeletal muscles. Mechanistically, SAM68 binds to SMN2 pre-mRNA, favoring recruitment of the splicing repressor hnRNP A1 and interfering with that of U2AF65 at the 3′ splice site of exon 7. These findings identify SAM68 as the first physiological regulator of SMN2 splicing in an SMA mouse model.
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is the leading genetic cause of infant mortality, with an incidence of approximately one in 6,000–10,000 newborns (Arnold and Burghes, 2013; Nurputra et al., 2013). SMA is an autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder primarily characterized by degeneration of spinal cord motor neurons and consequent atrophy of skeletal muscles. The disease is most commonly caused by homozygous deletion of the Survival Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) gene, leading to reduced levels of the ubiquitously expressed SMN protein (Arnold and Burghes, 2013; Nurputra et al., 2013). SMN plays key roles in several canonical cellular pathways, including biogenesis of the small nuclear RNPs, which are core components of the spliceosome (Wahl et al., 2009), pre-mRNA splicing, and RNA transport (Li et al., 2014). Nevertheless, attempts to directly link aberrant RNA processing with SMA pathogenesis have proven controversial (Zhang et al., 2008; Bäumer et al., 2009).
SMA patients retain at least one copy of the almost identical SMN2 gene. However, although it encodes a virtually identical protein, the expression levels of SMN2 are not sufficient to restore full SMN activity (Arnold and Burghes, 2013; Nurputra et al., 2013). The coding regions of SMN1 and SMN2 differ only for a silent C to T transition at position 6 in exon 7, leading to the skipping of exon 7 in most SMN2 transcripts and to production of an unstable SMNΔ7 protein that is rapidly degraded (Burnett et al., 2009; Cho and Dreyfuss, 2010). The residual low levels of SMN2 transcripts that include exon 7 produce small amounts of fully functional SMN protein, supporting early development and viability in patients and mouse models of SMA (Arnold and Burghes, 2013; Nurputra et al., 2013). Currently, there is no cure for SMA patients (Lorson and Lorson, 2012; Arnold and Burghes, 2013). Because rescue of exon 7 splicing represents a suitable therapeutic approach for SMA, understanding the molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of this splicing event is of fundamental importance.
Many RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) have been proposed to play a role in the regulation of SMN2 splicing in vitro (Hofmann et al., 2000; Hofmann and Wirth, 2002; Kashima and Manley, 2003; Kashima et al., 2007; Bose et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2008; Pedrotti et al., 2010; Singh et al., 2011), including hnRNP A1 (Kashima and Manley, 2003; Kashima et al., 2007) and SAM68 (Pedrotti et al., 2010), suggesting that the relative expression levels or activity of specific splicing factors can modulate SMN2 splicing (Pedrotti and Sette, 2010). However, whether any of these regulators play a role in vivo and contribute to the SMA phenotype is still currently unknown.
Herein, we have investigated the role of SAM68—a member of the signal transduction and activation of RNA family of RBPs (Lukong and Richard, 2003; Bielli et al., 2011)—in the regulation of SMN2 splicing in vivo by using the SMAΔ7 mouse model (Le et al., 2005). We show that SAM68 binds the exon 7 region of SMN2 pre-mRNA in vivo, promoting recruitment of the splicing repressor hnRNP A1 and interfering with binding of the general splicing factor U2AF65. Ablation of SAM68 activity was accompanied by a partial recovery in body weight, viability, and motility of SMAΔ7 mice. These effects correlated with regulation of SMN2 splicing, as knockout of Sam68 increased exon 7 inclusion and SMN expression in the cortex, cerebellum, spinal cord, and peripheral tissues of SMAΔ7 mice. Recovery of SMN expression resulted in an increase in nuclear gems in spinal cord motor neurons and in reduction of motor neuron loss, leading to significant amelioration of SMA-related defects in neuromuscular junctions (NMJs), skeletal muscles, and other peripheral organs. This work provides the first evidence of a splicing factor that modulates SMN2 splicing and SMN expression in vivo, thus affecting the phenotype of an SMA mouse model.
SAM68 binds SMN2 exon 7 and mediates recruitment of hnRNP A1 in vivo
In cultured cells, SAM68 binds the SMN2-specific exonic splicing silencer created by the C to T transition in exon 7 (UUUUA), thus repressing its recognition by the spliceosome through recruitment of the splicing repressor hnRNP A1 and causing exon skipping in transfected cells and in SMA fibroblasts in culture (Pedrotti et al., 2010). To determine whether SAM68 binds SMN2 exon 7 also in a physiological context, we performed UV–cross-linking immunoprecipitation (CLIP) experiments in the brain of non-SMA (SMN2Δ7;SMN2;Smn+/+) mice that are either wild type (Sam68+/+) or knockout (Sam68−/−) for Sam68. CLIP assays were evaluated by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) using primers spanning the SMN2 transcription unit (Fig. 1 A). SAM68 was recruited to the transgenic human SMN2 pre-mRNA in the Sam68+/+ brain, with a strong enrichment at the intron 6–exon 7 junction (I6/E7), whereas binding was reduced in the downstream junction (E7/I7) and in the upstream exons 3 and 5 (Fig. 1 B). SAM68 signals detected by CLIP assays were specific, as demonstrated by the strongly reduced or absent binding observed in SMN2Δ7;SMN2;Smn+/+ mice that are knocked out for Sam68 (Sam68−/−) (Fig. S1 A). Importantly, hnRNP A1 was efficiently recruited to the exon 7 region of the SMN2 pre-mRNA in Sam68+/+ mice, but its binding was strongly impaired in Sam68−/− mice (Fig. 1 C). These results suggest that binding of SAM68 to the intron 6–exon 7 junction of SMN2 pre-mRNA favors the recruitment of a splicing repressor in a physiological context of relevance for SMA.
U2AF65 is a general splicing factor that favors assembly of the U2 small nuclear RNP to the 3′ splice site (ss) and promotes exon definition (Wahl et al., 2009). Because SAM68 binds near the 3′ ss of exon 7 (Fig. 1 B), we tested whether it competes with recruitment of U2AF65 by performing in vitro pull-down assays using RNA-biotinylated probes of the SMN2 exon 7 region with the flanking 3′ intron including the branch site (Fig. 1 D; Pedrotti et al., 2010). A streptavidin pull-down assay using brain nuclear extracts showed that knockout of Sam68 expression increased recruitment of U2AF65 to SMN2 exon 7 RNA (Fig. 1 E). Conversely, overexpression of FLAG-SAM68 in HEK293T interfered with binding of endogenous U2AF65 to the 3′ ss (Fig. 1 F).
These experiments indicate that binding of SAM68 to SMN2 exon 7 favors the recruitment of a splicing repressor while counteracting that of a positive splicing regulator.
Ablation of Sam68 expression partially rescues viability, body weight, and motor function of SMAΔ7 mice
SMAΔ7 mice carry a homozygous deletion of the mouse Smn gene, two copies of the human SMN2 transgene, and the human SMN2Δ7 cDNA (SMN2Δ7;SMN2;Smn−/−; Le et al., 2005). To investigate whether SAM68 plays a role in SMA, we crossed SMN2Δ7;SMN2;Smn+/− mice with Sam68+/− mice (Fig. 2 A). Heterozygote mice were used because Sam68−/− males are sterile (Paronetto et al., 2009) and females are subfertile (Bianchi et al., 2010). Genotyping of the offspring confirmed that double knockout mice (SMN2Δ7;SMN2;Smn−/−;Sam68−/−) were born (Fig. 2 A). A backcross of heterozygote mice was performed to obtain SMN2Δ7 homozygous transgenic animals, as determined by qPCR measurement of SMN2Δ7 expression (Fig. 2 B).
Comparison of viability and body weight of the SMAΔ7/Sam68+/+ (SMN2Δ7;SMN2;Smn−/−;Sam68+/+) and SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− (SMN2Δ7;SMN2;Smn−/−;Sam68−/−) mice revealed that ablation of SAM68 function affected the phenotype of SMA mice (Fig. 2 C). SMAΔ7/Sam68+/+ mice displayed a maximum survival of 14 d (mean survival = 11 d), whereas SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− displayed a maximum survival of 20 d (mean survival = 16 d; Fig. 2 D). Thus, inhibition of SAM68 function in vivo significantly extended the life span of SMAΔ7 mice.
The first phenotypic difference between SMAΔ7/Sam68+/+ and SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice was body size (Fig. 2, C and E). The reduced weight of SMAΔ7 mice was first appreciated at 5 d postpartum (dpp; Le et al., 2005). We found that the weight of SMAΔ7/Sam68+/+ did not increase significantly from 5 dpp to death; in contrast, SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice steadily increased in size until 11 dpp, after which body weight started to decline (Fig. 2 E). Importantly, Sam68−/− mice are smaller than wild-type littermates (Fig. 2, C and E), indicating that this phenotype might partially limit the recovery in body weight observed in the SMAΔ7 context.
Next, we measured the motor function of the experimental mice. SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice at 8 and 10 dpp displayed less difficulty than SMAΔ7/Sam68+/+ littermates in righting when placed on their sides (Fig. 2 F). At 8 dpp, 11 out of 12 SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice were able to right themselves, whereas 60% of the SMAΔ7/Sam68+/+ (n = 10) could not, and the rest were slower (Fig. 2 F). The difference was maintained at 10 dpp, when five out of six SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice were able to right themselves in the time frame of the test, whereas none of the SMAΔ7/Sam68+/+ mice did (Fig. 2 F). Non-SMA Sam68−/− mice could readily right themselves at these ages (Fig. S1 B).
These results suggest that deletion of SAM68 function partially rescues postnatal development and the life span of SMAΔ7 mice.
Sam68 deletion rescues SMN2 splicing and expression in SMAΔ7 tissues
We then tested whether the partial rescue of the phenotype observed in SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice correlated with improvement of SMN2 splicing and expression. To this end, cortex, cerebellum, spinal cord, liver, heart, kidney, and lung samples from 10-dpp SMAΔ7/Sam68+/+ and SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice were collected for qPCR and Western blot analyses. Remarkably, Sam68 ablation resulted in an increase of exon 7 inclusion in all tissues analyzed (Fig. 3 A). Normalization of SMN2 exon 6 expression with Actin mRNA showed that there was no general increase in SMN2 transcription (Fig. S2 A), ruling out increased transcription or stability as part of the mechanism. Improved SMN2 exon 7 splicing correlated with an increase in SMN protein expression in SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice with respect to SMAΔ7/Sam68+/+ littermates, particularly in cortex and cerebellum (Fig. 3 B; and Fig. S2, B and C). Expression of GEMIN2, which is degraded when the SMN complex is less abundant and/or functionally impaired (Feng et al., 2005), was also significantly increased in cortex and cerebellum of SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− with respect to those of SMAΔ7/Sam68+/+ mice (Fig. S2, B and C). Conversely, ablation of Sam68 in a non-SMA context, where the SMN1-like murine Smn gene contributes to the large majority of SMN protein expression, did not exert any effect (Fig. S2 D), indicating that SAM68 specifically functions on the human SMN2 transgene.
Ablation of Sam68 rescues SMN assembly into nuclear gems in spinal cord motor neurons
The SMA phenotype is mainly caused by degeneration of motor neurons in the spinal cord as a consequence of low SMN expression (Arnold and Burghes, 2013; Nurputra et al., 2013). Notably, we found that SAM68 is expressed at much higher levels in motor neurons than in the surrounding cells of the spinal cord (Fig. 4 A). Thus, we set out to investigate whether loss of SAM68 function affected the expression of SMN in motor neurons. Because SMN levels and functionality correlate with its accumulation in nuclear structures named gems (Li et al., 2014), we tested whether SAM68 expression affected its subcellular localization. Spinal cords from 8-dpp non-SMA, SMAΔ7/Sam68+/+, and SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice were collected and stained for SMN and for the motor neuron marker choline acetyltransferase (ChAT). As expected (Branchu et al., 2013), SMN gems were almost absent in most motor neurons of SMAΔ7 mice (Fig. 4, B and C). However, knockout of Sam68 significantly increased the number of gems per motor neuron and the percentage of gem-containing motor neurons (Fig. 4, B and C), indicating that the increase in SMN protein expression was functionally relevant in the spinal cord.
Ablation of Sam68 rescues motor neuron loss in the spinal cord of SMAΔ7 mice
Progressive degeneration of motor neurons in the ventral horns of the spinal cord is the main hallmark of SMA (Arnold and Burghes, 2013; Nurputra et al., 2013). To test whether inhibition of SAM68 function affected the number of motor neurons in SMAΔ7 mice, coronal sections of the lumbar spinal cord (L1–L5) were stained with Nissl substance (Fig. 5, A and B). An unbiased count of the total number of motor neurons (see Materials and methods section Motor neuron count in lumbar spinal cord) indicated that SMAΔ7 mice displayed >50% reduction in the number of motor neurons at 8 dpp with respect to non-SMA mice (Fig. 5, B and C). In line with the recovery in SMN expression and nuclear gems assembly, ablation of Sam68 significantly promoted maintenance of motor neurons (Fig. 5, B and C), confirming that the rescue of SMN expression in these cells was functionally relevant.
Innervation of NMJs is ameliorated in SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice
Several axial and appendicular muscles of SMAΔ7 mice display denervation of NMJs (Ling et al., 2012). Thus, we tested whether Sam68 expression affected the proper innervation of NMJs in muscles of 10-dpp non-SMA and SMAΔ7 mice. Motor endplates were identified by confocal analyses with fluorophore-conjugated α-bungarotoxin, which specifically stains the subunit of acetylcholine receptors (AChRs), and nerve terminals were stained with antisynaptophysin and with an antibody directed against neurofilament heavy chains (Le et al., 2005; Hua et al., 2011). Analysis of the flexor digitorum brevis 2 (FDB2), one of the most vulnerable appendicular muscles in SMAΔ7 mice (Ling et al., 2012), showed a twofold increase in denervated NMJs in SMAΔ7/Sam68+/+ mice compared with age-matched non-SMA mice (Fig. 6, A and B). Importantly, this defect was rescued in the SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice (Fig. 6, A and B). No significant difference in NMJ innervation was observed in FDB2 muscles from non-SMA mice that were either wild type or knockout for Sam68 (Fig. 6 B). The rescue of innervation in SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice was also observed in the masseter (Fig. S3, A and B), one of the most vulnerable axial muscles in SMAΔ7 mice (Ling et al., 2012). These results indicate that Sam68 depletion improves innervation of NMJs in a mouse model of SMA.
Skeletal muscle atrophy and peripheral organ phenotypes are improved in SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice
NMJ denervation in SMAΔ7 mice leads to skeletal muscle atrophy without showing dystrophic features (Le et al., 2005). Consistently, as shown by the frequency distribution of the cross-sectional area (CSA), myofibers from triceps of 10-dpp SMAΔ7/Sam68+/+ mice were significantly smaller than those of non-SMA littermates (Fig. 7, A and B). Notably, muscles of SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice were characterized by bigger myofibers than those of SMAΔ7/Sam68+/+ littermates (Fig. 7, A and B), with the frequency distribution of CSA revealing a significant shift of the median value toward the larger size of fibers (Fig. 7 B). In non-SMA mice, knockout of Sam68 did not affect the size of myofibers (Fig. 7 B).
Skeletal muscle atrophy in SMA mice is accompanied by elevated expression of atrophy-related genes (Bricceno et al., 2012). The transcription factors FoxO3 and NF-κB are involved in activation of the ubiquitin–proteasome system and autophagy (Cai et al., 2004; Mammucari et al., 2007), two important intracellular degradation mechanisms responsible for skeletal muscle atrophy. Thus, we analyzed targets of FoxO3 and NF-κB (Cai et al., 2004; Mammucari et al., 2007), such as Trim63/MuRF1, Atrogin1/MAFbx, and Cathepsin L, in SMAΔ7/Sam68+/+ and SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice. Trim63, Atrogin1, and Cathepsin L were significantly up-regulated in muscles of SMAΔ7/Sam68+/+ mice; however, their expression was reduced to the levels of control mice in muscles from SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice (Fig. 7 C). Expression of these genes was not affected in non-SMA Sam68−/− mice (Fig. 7 C). These findings indicate that ablation of Sam68 rescues skeletal muscle atrophy in SMAΔ7 mice.
SMA mouse models also display defects in peripheral organs, such as the liver (Hua et al., 2011) and heart (Shababi et al., 2010). For instance, decreased expression of hepatic insulin-like growth factor (IGF)–binding protein acid labile subunit (Igfals) in neonatal SMA mice caused pronounced reduction of circulating IGF-1, which was suggested to contribute to the phenotype (Hua et al., 2011). Expression of Igf-1 and Igfals was strongly reduced in the liver of 10-dpp SMAΔ7/Sam68+/+ mice, whereas this defect was attenuated in SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice (Fig. S4 A). Moreover, histological examination showed hepatic steatosis accompanied by an influx of inflammatory cells in SMAΔ7/Sam68+/+ mice, but not in the liver of SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice, which resembled that of control mice (Fig. S4 B).
SMA mice show signs of oxidative stress in the heart, such as elevated expression of Angiotensin 1 receptor (AT1R), Rac1, and Nox2 (Shababi et al., 2010). Expression of AT1R and Rac1 was increased in the liver (Fig. S4 C) and heart (Fig. S4 D) of SMAΔ7/Sam68+/+ mice, whereas Nox2 was up-regulated only in the heart (Fig. S4 D). SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice showed lower expression levels of AT1R and Rac1 in these organs (Fig. S4, C and D), resembling those of non-SMA mice. None of these parameters in peripheral organs were affected in non-SMA Sam68−/− mice (Fig. S4, A, C, and D; and unpublished data).
The thickness of the interventricular septum (IVS) is reduced in SMA mice (Shababi et al., 2010; Hua et al., 2011). Accordingly, SMAΔ7/Sam68+/+ mice showed an ∼60% reduction in IVS thickness compared with the non-SMA littermates, whereas this reduction was partially compensated for in SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice (Fig. S4 E). Collectively, these results indicate that ablation of Sam68 also improves defects in the peripheral organs of SMAΔ7 mice.
Our work identifies SAM68 as a physiological regulator of SMN2 splicing. SAM68 binds SMN2 pre-mRNA in vivo near the 3′ ss of exon 7 and favors recruitment of hnRNP A1, while interfering with that of U2AF. Thus, our results suggest that SAM68 forms a repressive complex masking the 3′ ss and prevents its recognition by the spliceosome, causing exon 7 skipping and expression of the unstable SMNΔ7 variant. Importantly, ablation of Sam68 expression partially rescues SMN2 splicing and expression, resulting in increased viability and amelioration of the phenotype of SMAΔ7 mice.
SMA is caused by the inability of the SMN2 gene to compensate for the functional loss of SMN1 in patients (Arnold and Burghes, 2013; Nurputra et al., 2013). Because exon 7 skipping is the major cause of the decreased function of SMN2, characterization of the splicing factors and molecular mechanisms regulating this splicing event is of crucial relevance for understanding the cause of SMA and for the design of therapeutic approaches (Lorson and Lorson, 2012). An advance in this direction was provided by the identification of RBPs capable of modulating SMN2 splicing in cultured cells (Hofmann et al., 2000; Hofmann and Wirth, 2002; Kashima and Manley, 2003; Kashima et al., 2007; Bose et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2008; Pedrotti et al., 2010; Singh et al., 2011). However, whether any of these splicing regulators contribute to the phenotype of SMA is still currently unknown, as a role in the onset or progression of SMA has not been demonstrated for any of them. This is particularly relevant because splicing is a tissue- and cell context–specific combinatorial process (Fu and Ares, 2014). For instance, TRA2-β is a strong inducer of exon 7 inclusion in cultured cells (Hofmann et al., 2000), but its conditional knockout showed no effect on SMN2 splicing in motor neurons (Mende et al., 2010). These findings highlight the complexity of alternative splicing regulation in vivo and call for mechanistic studies to be performed directly in the cells or tissues that are relevant for the disease.
Our work was aimed at elucidating whether SAM68 is a physiological regulator of SMN2 splicing using an SMA mouse model. The SMAΔ7 mice used in our study display a severe form of the disease and die within 2 wk of birth (Le et al., 2005). Knockout of Sam68 expression in this strain resulted in significant body weight gain and extended survival until 20 dpp. Several pieces of evidence suggest that the impact of SAM68 on the SMA phenotype directly relates to its ability to modulate SMN2 splicing in vivo. First, SAM68 is recruited near the 3′ ss of exon 7 in the brain of mice expressing the human SMN2 transgene (Fig. 1 B). Furthermore, observations gathered using cell culture systems indicate that SAM68 interacts and cooperates with hnRNP A1 (Paronetto et al., 2007; Pedrotti et al., 2010), one of the best-characterized repressors of SMN2 exon 7 inclusion (Kashima and Manley, 2003; Kashima et al., 2007). Our findings now indicate that this cooperation is relevant in the context of SMA in vivo. Binding of hnRNP A1 in proximity to the 3′ ss of exon 7 was strongly reduced in the absence of SAM68 (Fig. 1 C). In contrast, we found an inverse correlation between binding of SAM68 and U2AF65 to exon 7 in vitro, with increased recruitment of this general splicing factor in brain extracts of Sam68-/- mice (Fig. 1 E). Thus, we propose a model in which SAM68 binds to the SMN2 pre-mRNA near the 3′ ss of exon 7, favoring the recruitment of hnRNP A1. Formation of this inhibitory complex on the nascent pre-mRNA interferes with binding of U2AF and efficient recognition of the 3′ ss, thereby masking the exon and favoring its skipping from the mature mRNA.
Regulation of SMN2 splicing by SAM68 is likely to affect the SMA phenotype directly. We found that ablation of Sam68 expression increased SMN2 exon 7 inclusion in the central nervous system and in all peripheral tissues analyzed (Fig. 3 A). Furthermore, enhanced exon 7 splicing resulted in higher SMN expression (Fig. 3 B). SMN is a ubiquitous protein that localizes to both the cytoplasm and nucleus, where it accumulates in nuclear gems that are implicated in RNP assembly and maturation (Li et al., 2014). SMN gems were increased in motor neurons of the SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− spinal cord (Fig. 4, B and C), thus providing a robust readout for functional SMN. Moreover, ablation of Sam68 partially rescued the loss of motor neurons occurring in the spinal cord of SMAΔ7 mice (Fig. 5). Notably, SAM68 expression is much higher in motor neurons than in surrounding cells of the spinal cord (Fig. 4 A), which may explain the particularly inefficient inclusion of exon 7 observed in motor neurons (Ruggiu et al., 2012). Collectively, these findings suggest that SAM68 physiologically participates in regulation of the disease-related SMN2 splicing and that amelioration of the SMA phenotype is likely a result of splicing-dependent stabilization of SMN protein in the absence of SAM68. However, the beneficial effect of Sam68 ablation on the splicing of SMN2 could be partially limited by the presence of SLM2, a homologous protein expressed in the brain (Ehrmann et al., 2013). SLM2 could partially complement the SAM68 splicing-repressive activity in Sam68−/− mice, as the two proteins bind almost identical RNA sequences (Galarneau and Richard, 2009). Moreover, we found that SLM2 also binds to the SMN2 pre-mRNA in vivo and can promote exon 7 skipping in transfected cells (unpublished data). Thus, as also suggested by the residual CLIP signal in Sam68−/− mice (Fig. S1 A), SLM2 might partially compensate for SAM68-dependent regulation of SMN2 splicing.
Knockout of Sam68 ameliorated hallmarks of the disease in SMAΔ7 mice. In addition to the rescue in SMN expression and in the number of motor neurons, SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice displayed an improvement in NMJ innervation and reduced muscle atrophy. Furthermore, ablation of Sam68 also affected other phenotypes described in SMA mouse models. In particular, SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice showed increased expression of IGF-1 pathway–related genes (Igf-1 and Igfals) in the liver, which was accompanied by a general improvement in the physiology of the organ (Fig. S4, A–C). Improved function of the IGF-1 pathway in the liver was also elicited by antisense oligonucleotide–mediated correction of SMN2 splicing, and it was supposed to contribute to improvement of the SMA phenotype (Hua et al., 2011). Although defects in peripheral organs have not been confirmed in SMA patients (Iascone et al., 2015), our observations suggest that increased expression of Igf-1 and Igfals and the general improvement of liver function in SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice might contribute to amelioration of the SMA phenotype observed in this study.
Although ablation of Sam68 expression caused a ubiquitous increase in SMN expression and ameliorated several hallmarks of SMA, we observed only a modest improvement in body weight and viability of SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice. Regarding the limited increase in body weight, this is likely because of the smaller size of prepuberal non-SMA Sam68−/− mice (Fig. 2, C and E), similar to what was reported for adult Sam68−/− mice (Richard et al., 2005; Paronetto et al., 2009). However, the limited effect on viability might result from other phenotypes described for this mouse. Sam68−/− mice have a relatively high perinatal lethality, with 30–35% of mice dying before weaning (Richard et al., 2005). Although the exact cause of decreased viability is still currently unknown, it is likely linked to the reported changes in target RNA expression and splicing in several organs (Paronetto et al., 2009; Bianchi et al., 2010; Huot et al., 2012), including the brain (Iijima et al., 2011). Thus, it is possible that other changes in gene expression and splicing caused by Sam68 ablation elicit deleterious effects that attenuate the benefit of the increased expression of SMN on the phenotype of SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice.
In conclusion, our work shows for the first time that direct interference with the endogenous expression of a single splicing factor rescues SMN2 splicing and expression in an SMA mouse model, resulting in amelioration of the phenotype. Thus, these findings strongly support a direct role for SAM68 in the pathology of SMA.
Materials and methods
Generation of transgenic mice and breeding strategy
Sam68+/− mice were generated by replacing exon 4 and part of exon 5 with a neomycin-resistant gene cassette as previously characterized (Richard et al., 2005). The SMA mouse model used was FVB.Cg-Tg(SMN2*delta7)4299Ahmb Tg(SMN2)89Ahmb Smn1tm1Msd/J (The Jackson Laboratory), hereafter referred to as SMAΔ7 mice. The SMAΔ7 mouse model was provided by F. Sangiuolo (University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy). SMN2Δ7;SMN2;Smn+/− transgenic mice were crossed with Sam68+/− mice to obtain SMN2Δ7;SMN2;Smn+/−;Sam68+/− mice on an FVB/N × C57BL/6 hybrid background. Mice were interbred to obtain SMAΔ7 mice (SMN2Δ7;SMN2;Smn−/−) that were wild type (Sam68+/+) or knockout (Sam68−/−) for Sam68. Breeding and maintenance of mice were done in accordance with the institutional guidelines of the University of Rome Tor Vergata and the approval of the Ethical Committee. Genomic DNA was isolated from the tail, amplified by PCR using the primers listed in Table S1, and genotyped as described previously (Le et al., 2005). Body weight and life span recordings were performed every day until the natural death of the animal. The righting test (recorded at 8 and 10 dpp) measured the time taken by mice to get back on their feet after being placed on the right side. Each mouse was subjected to five successive attempts separated by a 5-min rest period.
Motor neuron count in lumbar spinal cord
Anesthetized animals were submitted to intracardial perfusion with PBS followed by 4% PFA diluted in PBS. Coronal sections of the lumbar spinal cord (L1–L5) were cut with a cryostat at 30-µm thickness, and every seventh section was stained with Nissl substance. An optical fractionator stereological design (West et al., 1991) was used to obtain unbiased estimates of the total number of motor neurons using the Stereo Investigator system (Stereo Investigator software, version 4.04; MicroBrightField). A stack of MAC 5000 controller modules (Ludl Electronic Products) was configured to interface with a microscope (BX 50; Olympus) with a motorized stage and a color digital camera (HV-C20; Hitachi) with a Pentium II PC workstation. A 3D optical dissector counting probe (x, y, and z dimensions of 30 × 30 × 10 µm, respectively) was applied to a systematic random sample of motor neurons in the lumbar spinal cord. The region of interest was outlined using the 10× objective, whereas the 100× oil immersion objective was used for marking individual motor neurons. The total motor neuron number was estimated according to the formula given below:
ΣQ, total number of motor neurons counted in all optical field samples of the lumbar spinal cord; ssf, section sampling fraction; asf, area sampling fraction; and tsf, thickness sampling fraction (defined by dissector height divided by estimated mean section thickness; Biamonte et al., 2009).
Histology and immunofluorescence
Hearts were embedded in tissue-freezing medium, snap frozen in nitrogen-cooled isopentane, and stained. Transversal sections of 7 µm were arbitrarily chosen and photomicrographed using AxioVision 3.1 software (Carl Zeiss). IVS measurement was analyzed with ImageJ software (v.1.42q; National Institutes of Health) as described previously (Shababi et al., 2010).
For NMJ analysis, the FDB2 and masseter muscles were dissected and fixed in 4% PFA at 4°C for 180 min. Whole-mount muscles were immunostained with mouse antineurofilament (1:200; SMI-32; BioLegend) and rabbit antisynaptophysin (1:200; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Neurofilaments were visualized with TRITC AP donkey anti–mouse IgG (1:200; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.), and synaptic vesicles were visualized with Cy5 AP donkey anti–rabbit IgG (1:400; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.) secondary antibody. AChRs were labeled with Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated α-bungarotoxin (10 nM; Molecular Probes). Z-stack images were obtained at sequential focal planes 3 µm apart using a confocal microscope (Laser Scanning TCS SP2; Leica). Illustrated images are flattened projections of Z-stack images. Muscle innervation was analyzed with LAS AF Lite software (100 optical sections/genotype; Leica), and the innervation status of individual postsynaptic endplates was evaluated according to the extent to which the endplate overlaid with presynaptic components. For each muscle sample, 500 endplates were evaluated from randomly selected visual fields. Blind acquisition and analysis were performed using coded slides from three animals for each genotype.
For CSA analysis, triceps muscles were embedded in tissue-freezing medium, snap frozen in nitrogen-cooled isopentane, and stained. A minimum of three transversal 7-µm sections were arbitrarily chosen from the middle region of each muscle and photomicrographed using AxioVision 3.1 software. The mean CSA of at least 2,000 myofibers for each genotype was analyzed with ImageJ software.
For SMN gem detection, spinal cords were isolated from mice after perfusion, incubated overnight in 4% PFA solution, and transferred overnight in 30% sucrose in PBS at 4°C. 15-µm sections from the lumbar regions (L1–L5) were dissected, and one in every five sections was processed for immunofluorescence analysis. After heat-mediated antigen retrieval (10-mM sodium citrate and 0.05% Tween 20, pH 6.0; 10 min of microwaving), sections were incubated for 3 d with primary antibodies (prepared in 2% BSA in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100): mouse anti-SMN (1:100; BD), goat anti-ChAT (1:200; EMD Millipore), and rabbit anti-SAM68 (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). Sections were incubated for 2 h at room temperature with secondary antibodies: Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti–mouse IgG (1:200; Molecular Probes), Alexa Fluor 555 donkey anti–goat IgG (1:200; Molecular Probes), and Alexa Fluor 647 donkey anti–rabbit IgG (1:200; Molecular Probes). DAPI was used for nuclear staining. Sections were examined by a confocal laser-scanning microscope (LSM700; Carl Zeiss).
Western blot analysis
Western blot analysis was performed as previously described (Paronetto et al., 2007). The primary antibodies (1:1,000) were rabbit anti-SAM68, mouse anti-ACTIN, mouse anti-GAPDH (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), mouse anti-U2AF65 (Sigma-Aldrich), and mouse anti-SMN (BD).
Cell cultures, transfections, and cell extract preparation
Cell cultures, transfections, and sample preparation were performed by standard methods as previously described (Bielli et al., 2014). In brief, HEK293T cells were transfected with FLAG-SAM68 vector as indicated using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen).
Biotin-RNA pull-down experiments were performed using HEK293T cell nuclear extracts and SMN2 RNA probes in vitro synthesized from a PCR product amplified using primers (Table S1) and the plasmid PCI-SMN2 in the presence of biotin-labeled deoxynucleotide (Roche) as described previously (Pedrotti et al., 2010). Extracts were precleared for 1 h on protein A–Sepharose beads (Sigma-Aldrich) and 1 h on streptavidin-Sepharose beads (Sigma-Aldrich). Precleared extracts were then incubated with streptavidin-Sepharose beads in the presence of 0.1% BSA and biotinylated RNA probe for 2 h at 4°C under rotation. Beads were washed three times with washing buffer, and proteins were eluted in SDS sample buffer for Western blot analysis (Pedrotti et al., 2010).
CLIP assays were performed as previously described (Bielli et al., 2014). In brief, dissociated brain tissue was irradiated three times on ice (100 mJ/cm2). Cell suspension was centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 3 min, and the pellet was incubated for 10 min on ice in lysis buffer (50-mM Tris, pH 8.0, 100-mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 1-mM MgCl2, 0.1-mM CaCl2, 0.5-mM Na3VO4, 1-mM DTT, protease inhibitor cocktail [Sigma-Aldrich], and RNase inhibitor [Promega]). Samples were briefly sonicated and incubated with DNase (RNase-free; Ambion) for 3 min at 37°C and then centrifuged at 15,000 g for 3 min at 4°C. 1 mg of extract was treated with Proteinase K for 30 min at 55°C, and RNA was purified by standard procedure (input) or diluted to 1 ml with lysis buffer and immunoprecipitated using anti-SAM68 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) and anti–hnRNP A1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) antibodies or IgGs (negative control) in the presence of protein G magnetic Dynabeads (Novox; Life Technologies). 1,000 IU RNase I (Ambion) was added to immunoprecipitates and incubated for 2 h at 4°C under rotation. After stringent washes (Bielli et al., 2014), an aliquot (10%) was kept as a control of immunoprecipitation, while the rest was treated with 50 µg Proteinase K and incubated for 1 h at 55°C. RNA was then isolated by standard procedures.
qPCR was performed using LightCycler 480 SYBR green I Master and the LightCycler 480 System (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For CLIP analyses, each sample was normalized with respect to its input. SMN2 RNA associated with SAM68 or hnRNP A1 is represented as fold enrichment relative to IgG samples.
The quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD or SEM, as indicated in the figure legends. Two-tailed Student’s t test and one-way and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison posttest were performed using Prism 6 software (GraphPad Software). Kaplan-Meier survival data were analyzed with the log-rank test.
Online supplemental material
Fig. S1 shows the specific binding of SAM68 to SMN2 pre-mRNA and motor function analysis of non-SMA Sam68−/− mice. Fig. S2 shows the effects of Sam68 ablation on SMN and GEMIN2 expression in SMAΔ7 mice and supporting data for Fig. 3. Fig. S3 shows that ablation of Sam68 ameliorates innervation of NMJs in masseter muscle. Fig. S4 documents amelioration of peripheral defects in the SMAΔ7/Sam68−/− mice. Table S1 represents the list of the oligonucleotides used as PCR or qPCR primers in this study.
We thank Dr. P. Bielli for fruitful discussion throughout this work and helpful suggestions, Drs. C. Compagnucci, E. Cesari, R. Busà, F. Botti, S. Carosio, L. Forcina, and C. Nicoletti for technical assistance, and Dr. F. Biamonte for discussion of the stereological data.
This work was supported by grants from the Telethon Foundation (GGP09154 and GGP14095 to C. Sette and GGP13013 to A. Musarò), Muscular Dystrophy Association (186711 to C. Sette), Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (14581 to C. Sette), Fondazione Roma (to C. Sette), and Fondazione Santa Lucia Ricerca Corrente.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
analysis of variance
quantitative real-time PCR
spinal muscular atrophy