It is shown that enterovirus receptors are found mainly in the microsomal fraction of disrupted primate cells. Greater virus adsorption was exhibited by disrupted cells than by intact cells, indicating that enterovinis receptor may be present on intracellular membranes as well as on the surface of the cell. Polio-virus receptor is an integral part of, or is firmly attached to, the insoluble lipoproteins of the cell. All attempts to solubilize receptor have either destroyed virus-adsorbing activity, or have failed to separate it from sedimentable lipoproteins. The destruction of poliovirus receptor activity by proteolytic enzymes, surface active agents, organic solvents, concentrated urea solutions, phenol, formaldehyde, etc., all strongly indicate that this receptor function depends upon integrity of a protein portion of the membrane lipoproteins.
Article|
August 01 1961
THE LOCATION AND NATURE OF ENTEROVIRUS RECEPTORS IN SUSCEPTIBLE CELLS
John J. Holland,
John J. Holland
From the Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, and the Department of Bacteriology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
Search for other works by this author on:
Leroy C. McLaren
Leroy C. McLaren
From the Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, and the Department of Bacteriology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
Search for other works by this author on:
John J. Holland
From the Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, and the Department of Bacteriology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
Leroy C. McLaren
From the Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, and the Department of Bacteriology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
Received:
March 19 1961
Online ISSN: 1540-9538
Print ISSN: 0022-1007
Copyright, 1961, by The Rockefeller Institute
1961
J Exp Med (1961) 114 (2): 161–171.
Article history
Received:
March 19 1961
Citation
John J. Holland, Leroy C. McLaren; THE LOCATION AND NATURE OF ENTEROVIRUS RECEPTORS IN SUSCEPTIBLE CELLS . J Exp Med 1 August 1961; 114 (2): 161–171. doi: https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.114.2.161
Download citation file: