Centurion-Lara et al. Vol. 189, No. 4, February 15, 1999. Pages 647–656.

The authors regret that while revising their original submission to conform to the terminology that had recently been published for the T. pallidum genome they neglected to make two changes. The incorrect data appear on p. 649, left column, lines 9–12, and in the labeling of the lanes in Fig. 3. The corrected text appears below.

[p. 649] In careful experiments using limited dilutions of Nichols strain DNA, we showed that the efficiency of the primer sets was the following: tpr B, J > F, E, H > G, C/D, A, K, I > L.

[Fig. 3] G, F, E, C/D, B, A, L, K, J, I, H, +