Experimental and clinical evidence suggests that tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) play important roles in cancer progression. Here, we have characterized the ontogeny and function of TAM subsets in a mouse model of metastatic ovarian cancer that is representative for visceral peritoneal metastasis. We show that the omentum is a critical premetastatic niche for development of invasive disease in this model and define a unique subset of CD163+ Tim4+ resident omental macrophages responsible for metastatic spread of ovarian cancer cells. Transcriptomic analysis showed that resident CD163+ Tim4+ omental macrophages were phenotypically distinct and maintained their resident identity during tumor growth. Selective depletion of CD163+ Tim4+ macrophages in omentum using genetic and pharmacological tools prevented tumor progression and metastatic spread of disease. These studies describe a specific role for tissue-resident macrophages in the invasive progression of metastatic ovarian cancer. The molecular pathways of cross-talk between tissue-resident macrophages and disseminated cancer cells may represent new targets to prevent metastasis and disease recurrence.
Macrophages populate all human tissues, and their involvement in tumor progression and metastasis is well documented (Noy and Pollard, 2014). Recent advances in our understanding of macrophage biology suggest that tissue-resident macrophages and infiltrating tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) display a high degree of heterogenity, in terms of both phenotype and ontogeny. However, our understanding of the physiological relevance of this heterogeneity and its implications for tumor development is still limited. In particular, the role of resident macrophages in tissue-specific tumor initiation and progression is unclear.
Ovarian cancer is the eighth leading cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide and has a particularly poor prognosis due to almost 80% of cases being diagnosed with late-stage invasive disease (Ferlay et al., 2018). In particular, high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), the most frequent and aggressive form of ovarian cancer, is characterized by the formation of malignant ascites and peritoneal metastases, which results in a disastrous prognosis (Lengyel, 2010). HGSOC originates from transformation of fallopian tube or ovarian surface epithelial cells that disseminate at early stages into the peritoneal cavity by exfoliation (Lengyel, 2010). Due to the lack of any anatomical barriers, exfoliated cancer cells are carried by the peritoneal fluid and spread throughout the abdominal cavity in a process termed transcolemic metastasis (Kipps et al., 2013). Several reports have also suggested that ovarian cancer cells in ascites acquire cancer stem cell (CSC)–like properties that may play an important role in metastatic spread, chemosensitivity, and disease recurrence after therapy (Bapat et al., 2005). The most frequent site for metastasis in HGSOC is the omentum (Sehouli et al., 2009), an apron of visceral adipose tissue in the abdomen formed from a fold of the peritoneal mesothelium. Omentum contains a high density of lymphoid aggregates known as milky spots or fat-associated lymphoid clusters (FALCs), which are thought to contribute to peritoneal and intestinal immunity (Krist et al., 1995; Rangel-Moreno et al., 2009; Bénézech et al., 2015). The tropism of ovarian cancer cells for the omentum and its implications for disease progression are not yet fully understood. Several reports have suggested that FALCs play an active role in colonization of omentum (Hagiwara et al., 1993), but the tumor-promoting function of FALCs was shown to be independent of both B and T lymphocytes (Clark et al., 2013). Myeloid cells are also abundant in FALCs, and macrophage density was recently shown to increase proportionally with disease score in omenta from ovarian cancer patients (Pearce et al., 2018). However, the specific role of omental macrophages in colonization and disease progression remains to be explored.
Tissue-resident macrophages perform trophic functions that contribute to organ development, tissue remodeling, and homeostasis (Pollard, 2009). Experimental evidence has shown that TAMs contribute to tumor progression by promoting angiogenesis, matrix remodeling, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT; Raggi et al., 2016), which ultimately leads to increased cell invasion and metastasis (Noy and Pollard, 2014). These properties reflect the trophic functions of macrophages in development, and consistent with these developmental functions, the transcriptome of TAMs from mammary gland tumors has been shown to be enriched for genes that also define embryonic macrophages (Ojalvo et al., 2010). Until recently, it was thought that tissue macrophages were maintained from bone marrow–derived monocyte precursors, with the exception of the brain microglia and Langerhans cells in the skin (Ginhoux et al., 2010; Ginhoux and Merad, 2010), and the same has generally been assumed for TAMs (Lahmar et al., 2016). However, recent advances in molecular techniques that allow the fate-mapping of macrophages in vivo have revealed that most tissue macrophages originate from embryonic precursors and can be maintained by local proliferation with little input from the bone marrow (Schulz et al., 2012). Subsequent studies have shown that tissue-resident macrophages of embryonic origin can be gradually replaced by monocyte-derived cells to varying degrees depending on the specific tissue (Ginhoux and Guilliams, 2016). The functional implications of these distinct developmental origins and their respective contributions to tumorigenesis have not yet been fully explored. However, recent reports suggest that embryo-derived tissue-resident macrophages can proliferate during tumor development and have distinct functions in tumor progression compared with monocyte-derived TAMs (Zhu et al., 2017; Loyher et al., 2018).
It is therefore critically important to further understand the specific axes of cross-talk between tissue-resident macrophages and cancer cells, during both tumor initiation and the malignant progression of disseminated tumor cells, as this may reveal new targets to combat tumor progression and thwart the development of invasive disease.
Here, we demonstrate that omentum represents a critical premetastatic niche in a mouse model of metastatic ovarian cancer and define a specific subset of tissue-resident macrophages in omentum that express CD163 and Tim4 and are required for the metastatic spread of ovarian cancer cells. Using genetic fate-mapping and shielded chimera experiments, we show that CD163+ Tim4+ omental macrophages are derived from embryonic progenitors and maintained independently of bone marrow–derived monocytes. Specific depletion of CD163+ Tim4+ macrophages, using genetic tools or antibody-targeted cytotoxic liposomes, was sufficient to prevent the development of metastatic disease, whereas depletion of monocyte-derived TAMs had no impact. These studies suggest that specific interactions between disseminated tumor cells and tissue-resident CD163+ Tim4+ macrophages in the omentum promote the malignant progression of ovarian cancer. The molecular pathways that underly these interactions may represent new therapeutic targets for treatment of invasive metastatic disease.
The omentum is a critical premetastatic niche for ovarian cancer cells
The omentum is an adipose tissue formed from a fold of the peritoneal mesothelium. In humans, the greater omentum covers the majority of the abdomen, whereas in mouse the omentum is only a thin stretch of adipose tissue located between the stomach, pancreas, and spleen (Fig. 1 A). The peritoneal spread of ovarian cancer has been modeled in mice using the immortalized mouse ovarian epithelial cell line ID8 (Roby et al., 2000). The i.p. injection of ID8 cells leads to the development of diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis and malignant ascites with a long latency period (up to 12 wk), which has been widely used as a model of late-stage ovarian cancer (Charles et al., 2009; Motz et al., 2014; Lee et al., 2019). We used an ID8 cell line transduced to express firefly luciferase (ID8-luc; Hagemann et al., 2008) to monitor tumor progression after i.p. injection by noninvasive bioluminescent imaging. We observed that ID8 cells localized primarily to the omentum for up to 35 d before spreading throughout the peritoneal cavity (Fig. 1 B). Infiltration of tumor cells into the omentum was confirmed by histological analysis, where visible tumor nodules could be observed within the adipose tissue from 35 d (Fig. 1 C). From day 63, the entire omentum was invaded by tumor cells, and only residual adipose tissue remained (Fig. 1 C). Interestingly, despite the presence of obvious tumor nodules in omentum from day 35, accumulation of ascitic ID8 cells was not detectable until >50 d after i.p. injection (Fig. 1 D). Ultimately, ascites formation was associated with the development of multiple distant metastases in the diaphragm and peritoneal wall (Fig. 1 E), reflecting late-stage disease in HGSOC patients. To establish the contribution of the omentum to the disease course in this model, we transplanted ID8-luc cells into omentectomized mice and monitored tumor growth. Whereas sham-operated and control mice showed a comparable course of tumor progression with accumulation of ascitic tumor cells after 63 d, we observed only minimal tumor growth in omentectomized mice, and ascitic cells were barely detectable (Fig. 1, F and G). These data suggested that the omentum was a critical premetastatic niche for tumor progression in this model and not merely a receptive site for peritoneal metastasis.
Ovarian cancer cells colonize FALCs in close contact with omental macrophages
The omentum has a particularly high density of FALCs, which are thought to be important structures for capturing peritoneal antigens (Rangel-Moreno et al., 2009; Fig. 2 A). Previous studies have proposed that FALCs promote the colonization of omentum by ovarian cancer cells; however, neither B or T lymphocytes were shown to contribute to tumor growth (Clark et al., 2013). To visualize the localization of ID8 cells in the omentum, we labeled the cells with Qdots (Qtracker705) before i.p. injection and analyzed omentum by whole-mount confocal imaging. 1 d after injection, we observed that ID8 cells were located in the vicinity of FALCs, an area densely populated by omental macrophages (Fig. 2 B). To further characterize omental macrophages after colonization with ID8 cells, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) on macrophages isolated from omentum 10 wk after injection of ID8 cells. Macrophages were isolated by flow-assisted cell sorting with gating on CD11b+ F4/80+ CD64+ cells and processed for scRNAseq analysis using the 10× Genomics Chromium platform. After filtering to exclude doublets and dead cells, we obtained 16,392 single-cell transcriptomes from four animals for downstream analysis. Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) clustering analysis identified 10 major cell clusters (Fig. 2 C). Further analysis of the most significant differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in each cluster identified several common macrophage markers that were differentially expressed among these subsets. We identified a single cluster coexpressingLyve-1, Cd163, and Tim4 (Fig. 2, D and E), which have previously been used to characterize resident macrophages in various tissues. Tim4 has been shown to be expressed by large peritoneal macrophages (Rosas et al., 2014), T cell zone macrophages in lymph nodes (Baratin et al., 2017), liver Kupffer cells (Scott et al., 2016), and resident intestinal macrophages (De Schepper et al., 2018). Lyve-1 was shown to be expressed by perivascular macrophages (Lim et al., 2018) and more recently by a subset of monocyte-derived interstitial macrophages in various tissues (Chakarov et al., 2019). Finally, CD163 is expressed by a number of tissue-resident macrophage populations, including Kupffer cells, red pulp macrophages in the spleen, and bone marrow macrophages (Etzerodt and Moestrup, 2013). In addition to these three markers, several additional cell surface markers have been used to characterize tissue-resident macrophages. This includes CD169 (Siglec-1) expression on bone marrow macrophages, alveolar macrophages, metallophilic macrophages in the spleen, and subcapsular sinus macrophages in the lymph nodes (Gray and Cyster, 2012). To further characterize the heterogeneity of omental macrophages, we analyzed the expression of these markers by flow cytometry. Gating on the CD11b+ myeloid cell fraction (CD45.2+ Lin− [CD5, CD19, NK1.1, Ly6G, SiglecF]), we identified macrophages as F4/80+ CD64+ cells (Fig. 3 A, i), whereas monocytes were F4/80− CD64− CCR2+ (Fig. 3 A, ii). We observed a gradient of CD169 expression, where only CD169hi cells coexpressed Lyve-1 (Fig. 3 A, iii). Further analysis showed that CD169− Lyve-1− and CD169int Lyve-1− cells were also negative for CD163 and Tim4 expression (Fig. S1 B), indicating a less mature phenotype. In contrast, CD169hi Lyve-1+ cells could be separated into four distinct populations based on CD163 and Tim4 expression: CD163+ Tim4+ (P1), CD163+ Tim4− (P2), CD163− Tim4− (P3), and CD163− Tim4+ (P4; Fig. 3 A, iv). This analysis corroborated the UMAP clustering analysis on omental TAMs, where P1 macrophages represent cluster 8, and P2 macrophages represent cluster 0 (Fig. 2, C–E). In contrast, Lyve-1+ P3 and Lyve-1+ Tim4+ P4 macrophages were not separated based on the UMAP analysis.
We next analyzed the localization of these macrophage subsets in omentum by whole-mount confocal imaging. We found that CD169+ cells were distributed evenly throughout the tissue, whereas CD169+ CD163+ cells were located at the interface between FALCs and the surrounding adipose tissue (Fig. 3 B). Tim4+ CD163− cells were mainly located within FALCs, whereas CD163+ Tim4+ cells were found only at the interface between FALCs and the surrounding adipose tissue (Fig. 3 C), similarly to CD169+ CD163+ cells (Fig. 3 B). Therefore, P1 (CD163+ Tim4+) and P2 (CD163+ Tim4−) macrophages are specifically located in the tissue surrounding FALCs, whereas P3 (CD163− Tim4−) macrophages are widely distributed throughout the adipose tissue, and P4 (CD163− Tim4+) macrophages appear to be located within FALCs.
To determine the dynamics of these macrophage subsets during colonization of omentum by ovarian cancer cells and tumor progression, we performed a kinetic analysis by flow cytometry after transplantation of ID8 cells. Among the CD11b+ myeloid fraction, CCR2+ monocytes represent the most abundant population in naive omentum, which remained unchanged for up to 4 wk after ID8 cell injection (Fig. 3 D). After 4 wk, the proportion of monocytes decreased coincidently with an increase in CD169lo Lyve-1− macrophages, followed by a proportional increase in both CD169lo Lyve-1− and CD169int Lyve-1− and CD169hi Lyve-1+ cells at 6 and 8 wk of tumor growth (Fig. 3 D). The proportional increase in CD169hi Lyve-1+ macrophages appeared to be driven by an increase in P3 (CD163− Tim4−). In contrast, the proportion of P1 (CD163+ Tim4+), and to a lesser extent P2 (CD163+ Tim4−), was significantly decreased compared with normal omentum, whereas P4 (CD163− Tim4+) remained relatively unchanged (Fig. 3 E).
In summary, these studies showed that ID8 cells colonize the omentum in the vicinity of FALCs and juxtaposed to resident CD163+ Tim4+ macrophages. As tumors progressed, there was an increase in the proportion of CD169+ Lyve-1+ macrophages, but the fraction of resident CD163+ Tim4+ cells remained stable.
Embryonic origin of tissue-resident CD163+ Tim4+ macrophages in omentum
To evaluate the ontogeny and homeostasis of the different macrophage subsets in omentum during ID8 tumor development, we prepared protected radiation chimeras using CD45.1 congenic C57BL/6 recipient mice. The abdomen of mice was protected with lead shielding to avoid radiation-induced replacement of tissue-resident macrophages. Following irradiation, we adoptively transferred bone marrow cells from CD45.1 × CD45.2 F1 mice (CD45.1/.2), which allowed the distinction between host (CD45.1+) and donor cells (CD45.1+/CD45.2+) by flow cytometry (Fig. 4 A). 5 wk after the bone marrow transplantation, chimerism was confirmed in blood by flow cytometry (Fig. S2 A) before mice were injected with ID8 cells. After an additional 8 wk of tumor growth, omentum was harvested for analysis. To track bone marrow–derived cells, CD45.1 and CD45.2 expression by omental macrophages was analyzed and normalized to blood monocytes. Chimerism within P3 (CD163− Tim4−) and P4 (CD163− Tim4+) populations was, on average, close to 100%, in both naive and tumor-bearing mice (Fig. 4, B and C). In contrast, chimerism in P1 (CD163+ Tim4+) macrophages was close to zero, irrespective of tumor growth, while the P2 (Tim4− CD163+) population showed ∼40% chimerism in naive mice and complete chimerism in tumor-bearing mice (Fig. 4, B and C). These data showed that CD163+ Tim4+ omental macrophages (P1) were not replaced by bone marrow–derived cells throughout the course of this experiment, which was >3 mo. However, P3 and P4 cells were completely replaced in both steady state and during tumor development over this time course, suggesting that these cells represent monocyte-derived macrophages of limited life span. In contrast, CD163+ Tim4− macrophages (P2) were only partially replaced over 3 mo at steady state, although they showed complete replacement during tumor growth. Therefore, these cells represent long-lived monocyte-derived macrophages whose replacement is accelerated during tumor development.
To verify the contribution of circulating monocytes to omental TAMs, we next performed a fluorescent fate-mapping experiment using mice expressing Cx3cr1-CreERT2 (Cx3cr1CreER) and a Rosa26-lox-STOP-lox(LSL)-tdRFP reporter allele (Cx3cr1-R26tdRFP;Yona et al., 2013; Goossens et al., 2019). In adult mice, Cx3cr1 is expressed by monocytes in blood and omentum, but expression is decreased as monocytes mature into macrophages (Fig. 4, D and E). To label monocytes during tumor development, Cx3cr1-R26tdRFP mice were injected with ID8 cells, and after 6 wk, mice were given a single dose of tamoxifen by oral gavage to activate RFP expression in Cx3cr1+ cells. 10 d later, RFP in omental macrophages was assessed by flow cytometry. As expected, P3 and P4 populations were most strongly labeled with RFP under these conditions, whereas P2 macrophages were labeled to a lesser extent (Fig. 4 F). In contrast, there was minimal labeling of CD163+ Tim4+ cells (P1; Fig. 4 F). These data are consistent with a rapid replacement of P3 and P4 macrophages by monocytes, while P2 cells are replaced with slightly slower kinetics. However, in keeping with data from shielded chimera experiments, there was very little replacement of P1 macrophages by Cx3Cr1-expressing precursors.
The experiments described above showed that CD163+ Tim4+ omental macrophages were not derived from bone marrow–dependent monocyte precursors, suggesting that these tissue-resident macrophages may be of embryonic origins. To evaluate the potential embryonic origins of these cells, we performed a fate mapping experiment with Cx3cr1CreER mice in utero, since Cx3cr1 is expressed in both embryonic macrophage precursors and fetal monocytes (Yona et al., 2013). Cx3cr1-R26YFP embryos were pulse-labeled with tamoxifen at E16.5, and YFP expression in macrophages from omentum was subsequently analyzed by flow cytometry at 8 wk of age (Fig. 4 G). After normalization of YFP+ cells to microglia to assess labeling efficiency (Fig. S2 C), we observed that ∼20% of P1 macrophages (CD163+ Tim4+) in adult omentum were YFP+ (Fig. 4, H and I), indicating an embryonic origin for these cells. In contrast, very few YFP+ cells were detected in the P2 (CD163+ Tim4−), P3 (CD163− Tim4−), and P4 (CD163− Tim4−) populations (Fig. 4, H and I), demonstrating that these cells were not derived from embryonic progenitors or were most likely replaced by monocyte-derived cells in the adult.
Collectively, these experiments show that CD163+ Tim4+ macrophages in omentum are uniquely independent of bone marrow–derived monocytes both in steady state and during tumor growth and are thus likely to maintain themselves locally by self-renewal. Furthermore, at least a significant proportion of these cells are of embryonic origin.
CD163+ Tim4+ tissue-resident macrophages express a unique transcriptional profile
To evaluate the impact of tumor growth on the phenotype of different macrophage subsets in omentum, we performed transcriptional profiling of cells sorted by flow cytometry at steady state and at different time points after seeding with tumor cells. We isolated P1, P2, and P3 macrophages by FACS from naive omentum and at 5 or 10 wk after injection of ID8 cells (Fig. 5 A) and prepared sequencing libraries directly from snap-frozen cell pellets. Libraries were sequenced to an average read depth of 42.7 million reads per sample. Unfortunately, the RNA yield in P4 macrophages was too low to generate sequencing libraries. A heatmap showing the 5,000 most-variable genes in the dataset is shown in Fig. S3 A. Initial analysis confirmed an overlap in the expression levels of the markers highlighted in the scRNAseq analysis; P1 macrophages coexpressing Lyve-1, CD163, and Tim4; and P2 macrophages expressing Lyve-1 and CD163, but not Tim4. However, P3 macrophages expressed very low levels of all three markers (Fig. S3 B). To analyze the relationship between the different macrophage populations, we performed a principal component analysis (PCA) combined with network analysis to show then nearest neighbors. This analysis showed that the transcriptional profile of CD163+ Tim4+ resident macrophages (P1) did not undergo major changes during tumor growth, as all samples from this population clustered closely together (Fig. 5 B). Interestingly, the long-lived monocyte-derived CD163+ Tim4− macrophages (P2) were closely related to CD163+ Tim4+ resident macrophages (P1) at steady state, but in tumor-bearing mice, they became more closely aligned to P3 (Fig. 5 B), which likely reflects the increased replacement of P2 macrophages by monocyte-derived cells during tumor growth (Fig. 4, B and C). To further analyze the transcriptional changes between these three major subsets in established tumors, we extracted DEGs by pairwise and grouped comparisons of P1, P2, and P3 at 10 wk of tumor growth (Fig. 5 C). We then performed a self-organizing map (SOM) clustering analysis to identify clusters of genes enriched in either a single population or a group of populations (Fig. 5 D). In the SOM clustering analysis, genes with a similar expression profile are first organized into SOMs. Within these maps, a pie chart depicts the relative enrichment of genes in the three populations analyzed (P1, P2, and P3), and the size of the pie slices reflects the gene enrichment. SOMs that are similar are then grouped together, generating clusters of SOMs with a comparable gene enrichment profile. This analysis generated 16 different SOMs that were subsequently grouped in 7 distinct clusters. Cluster 2 was enriched in P1, cluster 6 in P2, and cluster 5 in P3. Cluster 3 contained genes enriched in both P1 and P2, and cluster 7 was enriched in both P2 and P3. We then used ClusterProfiler enrichment analysis and the Gene Ontology (GO) database for the different SOM clusters to identify biological processes enriched in the different populations. This analysis revealed multiple enriched processes in clusters 2, 3, 5, and 6; the 15 most significant terms are shown in Fig. 5 E. Of particular interest, positive regulation of JAK-STAT signaling was uniquely enriched in CD163+ Tim4+ macrophages (P1, cluster 2; Fig. S5 A), whereas pathways related to angiogenesis, blood vessel development, and tissue remodeling were shared between CD163+ populations (P1 and P2, cluster 3; Fig. S5, B and C). Interestingly, the STAT pathway is part of the self-renewal gene regulatory network in macrophages (Soucie et al., 2016), in line with the ability of these cells to maintain themselves independently of bone marrow–derived monocytes. In addition, the pathways and processes enriched in both CD163+ populations (P1 and P2) have previously been linked with tumor-promoting functions of TAMs (Noy and Pollard, 2014). In contrast, pathways associated with T cell differentiation were uniquely associated with P3 (cluster 5; Fig. S5 D). This analysis suggested a functional diversification of omental macrophage subsets in the context of tumor growth.
Specific depletion of CD163+ Tim4+ macrophages prevents metastatic spread of ovarian cancer
Next, we sought to analyze the specific contributions of omental macrophage subsets to disease progression in our model. Initial experiments showed that tumor development and accumulation of malignant ascites were not affected inCcr2−/− mice (Fig. S4, A–D). These mice have impaired recruitment of monocyte-derived cells, suggesting a redundant function of CCR2-dependent monocyte-derived macrophages in disease progression. To assess the specific contribution of CD163+ Tim4+ tissue-resident macrophages (P1), we generated transgenic mice that exclusively express DTR in CD163+ macrophages (Cd163-Csf1rDTR; Etzerodt et al., 2019); Cd163-iCre knock-in mice (Cd163iCre) were crossed with transgenic mice expressing an LSL-DTR cassette under control of the Csf1r-promoter (Tg(Csf1r-LSL-DTR)). Flow cytometry analysis of omentum from Cd163-Csf1rDTR mice 24 h after a single injection of diptheria toxin (DT; 4 ng/kg) confirmed the specific ablation of CD163+ P1 and P2 macrophages (Fig. S4, E–G). However, 6 d after DT treatment, monocyte-derived P2 macrophages were completely restored, while resident P1 macrophages remained absent (Fig. S4, E–G). In addition, there was also a complete recovery of CD163+ peritoneal macrophages 6 d after DT treatment (Fig. S4 H). Thus, this approach allows the selective ablation of resident CD163+ P1 macrophages in omentum and the opportunity to assess their unique contribution toward tumor progression. We treated cohorts of Cd163-Csf1rDTR and Cre-negative littermate controls (Csf1rLSL-DTR) with DT and 6 d later injected ID8 cells i.p. After 10 wk, omentum was collected for analysis by flow cytometry, and tumor progression was assessed (Fig. 6 A). At this time point, P1 macrophages remained depleted in omenta from Cd163-Csf1rDTR mice while all other populations were unchanged (Fig. 6, B and C). Interestingly, although tumor seeding of the omentum was unaffected (Fig. 6 D), Cd163-Csf1rDTR mice showed a significant reduction in ascitic tumor cells (Fig. 6 E) and reduced ascites (Fig. 6 F). Moreover, metastases to the diaphragm were significantly reduced in Cd163-Csf1rDTR mice (Fig. 6, G and H). These data suggested that tissue-resident CD163+ Tim4+ macrophages in the omentum contributed significantly to the metastatic spread of ovarian cancer cells and the development of invasive disease.
To further substantiate the role of CD163+ macrophages in tumor progression, we used CD163-targeted cytotoxic lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) to therapeutically deplete CD163+ macrophages in tumor-bearing mice (Etzerodt et al., 2019). These LNPs contain 5% polyethylene glycol (PEG; molecular weight, 2,000 g/mol) in the lipid bilayer, which minimizes nonspecific phagocytic uptake, and are loaded with the cytotoxic drug doxorubicin (dxr) to kill target cells. LNPs are targeted specifically to CD163-expressing cells by conjugation of an anti-CD163 monoclonal antibody to PEG (Etzerodt et al., 2012). To achieve therapeutic depletion of CD163+ macrophages, mice were injected with ID8 cells and 5 wk later treated i.v. twice a week for 5 wk with vehicle, empty CD163-targeted LNPs (αCD163-ctrl), or dxr-loaded LNPs (αCD163-dxr; Fig. 6 I). In vivo bioluminescent imaging showed that continuous depletion of CD163+ cells after αCD163-dxr treatment resulted in a significant reduction of overall tumor burden in the abdomen (Fig. 6 J). As expected, sustained depletion of CD163+ cells led to the specific loss of both P1 and P2 macrophages in omentum (Fig. 6 K), which was accompanied by a significant decrease of tumor burden in both omentum and ascites (Fig. 6, L–N), suggesting that the additional absence of monocyte-derived CD163+ macrophages (P2) contributed to reduced tumor growth in the omentum (Fig. 6 L), which was not observed when only tissue-resident CD163+ Tim4+ macrophages (P1) were depleted (Fig. 6 D).
Ovarian cancer cells in ascites acquire CSC characteristics
Ascitic tumor development and peritoneal metastases indicate a particularly poor prognosis for ovarian cancer patients. Our studies showed a long latency in ascitic tumor development and peritoneal spread of ID8 cells after seeding the omentum, and omentectomy prevented development of ascitic disease (Fig. 1), suggesting that the omentum represents a key premetastatic niche. In addition, the studies described above showed that tissue-resident macrophages in omentum contributed significantly to the accumulation of ascitic cells and the development of invasive disease (Fig. 6). To further explore the phenotype of ascitic ID8 cells and define the mechanisms behind this invasive transition, we performed transcriptomic analysis of cultured ID8 cells and tumor cells isolated from malignant ascites 11 wk after transplantation (ID8-A11). ID8 and ID8-A11 cells were sorted by flow cytometry, and RNAseq libraries were prepared directly from frozen cell pellets. To identify meaningful biological processes that are affected in ID8-A11 cells compared with parental ID8 cells, we performed a GO term-based gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA; Fig. S5 E); GO terms are represented by nodes that are colored according to the normalized enrichment score. GO terms that share DEGs are grouped together, generating clusters, thus indicating common biological processes. With this analysis, we found clusters of GO terms up-regulated in ID8-A11 cells that represent biological processes often associated with metastatic tumor cells, including drug metabolism, epithelial cell migration, organization of cell junctions, and organ development (Fig. S5 E, red). In contrast, clusters of GO terms that were down-regulated in ID8-A11 cells were mainly linked with biological processes associated with cell division such as cytokinesis, cell cycle, DNA repair, and replication (Fig. S5 E, blue). To further explore these pathways, we performed GSEA; in accordance with a metastatic phenotype, GSEA showed a positive enrichment of gene sets associated with EMT and down-regulation of genes associated with cell cycle and cell division (Fig. S5 F). The inverse enrichment of EMT pathways versus cell division, coupled with the up-regulation of WNT, NOTCH, and STAT3 signaling (Fig. S5 F), suggested that ID8-A11 cells may have acquired a CSC-like phenotype. Ascitic tumor cells with CSC characteristics have been associated with advanced human ovarian cancer, where they form multilayered spheroid structures (Bapat et al., 2005). To assess the CSC-like phenotype of ascitic ID8 cells compared with ID8 cells in omentum, we next compiled a list of genes that were reported as biomarkers of ovarian CSCs (Table S1) and analyzed their expression in ascitic ID8 cells (ID8-A11) compared with cells in the omentum (ID8-OM). This analysis confirmed an up-regulation of most CSC markers in ascitic ID8 cells (Fig. 7 A, Cluster III). In addition, we established a panel of cell-surface CSC markers and measured their expression by flow cytometry. In agreement with gene expression analysis, ID8-A11 cells showed increased expression of a number of surface markers for CSCs, including CD44, CD54, CD55, CD106, and CD117, as compared with ID8 cells in omentum (Fig. 7 B). As mentioned above, spheroid formation is a functional characteristic of CSCs, as is the increased activity of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH; Kim et al., 2018). In contrast to cultured ID8 cells, ascitic ID8-A11 cells rapidly formed spheroids in vitro (Fig. 7, C and D). In addition, flow cytometry analysis of ALDH activity using the Aldefluor assay showed increased ALDH activity in ID8-A11 cells (Fig. 7 E). Finally, acquisition of CSC characteristics is associated with increased tumor-initiating potential and metastatic spread. We therefore injected cohorts of mice with either ID8 or ID8-A11 cells and followed tumor burden and spread in vivo using bioluminescence. The overall tumor burden in mice injected with ID8-A11 cells was already significantly increased after 20 d, whereas parental ID8 cells still had not established significant tumors (Fig. 7 F). Moreover, when tumors did establish in mice injected with ID8 cells, these were restricted to the omentum, whereas ID8-A11 cells had spread throughout the peritoneal cavity (Fig. 7 G). This was further substantiated in ex vivo analysis that showed increased growth of ID8 cells in omentum at this time point and the absence of ascites, whereas ID8-A11 cells showed reduced growth in omentum and generated considerable ascitic tumor growth (Fig. 7, H and I). These studies demonstrated that the transition to invasive disease in this model was associated with the acquisition of CSC characteristics by ascitic tumor cells.
CD163+ Tim4+ tissue-resident macrophages promote the CSC-like phenotype of ovarian cancer cells
We next evaluated the impact of tissue-resident macrophages in omentum on the acquisition of CSC characteristics by ascitic ID8 cells. CD163+ macrophages in the omentum were depleted by three consecutive injections of CD163-targeted cytotoxic LNPs (αCD163-dxr) on days 1, 3, and 5, and control mice were injected with either vehicle or empty LNPs (αCD163-ctrl). Monocyte-derived CD163+ macrophages (P2) were then allowed to recover before injection of ID8 cells on day 8, and the development of invasive disease was analyzed at 10 wk (Fig. 8 A). Specific depletion of resident CD163+ Tim4+ macrophages (P1) in omentum was confirmed by flow cytometry (Fig. 8, B and C), as was the impaired development of invasive disease, including the number of ascitic tumor cells and peritoneal metastases (Fig. 8, D–G). To evaluate the impact on CSC-like phenotype in ID8 cells, we next analyzed the expression of our CSC marker panel by flow cytometry on ascitic ID8 cells from control-treated mice and after depletion of resident omental macrophages (Fig. 7 B and Table S1). We then conducted an unsupervised gating analysis and dimensionality reduction using t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE). Samples corresponding to individual treatment groups were subsequently gated out and replotted as individual tSNE plots (Fig. 8 H). This analysis showed that ascitic tumor cells from αCD163-dxr–treated mice, specifically lacking resident CD163+ Tim4+ macrophages in the omentum, clearly separated from ascitic tumor cells in control mice (Fig. 8 H, green versus red/blue, respectively). Subsequent color mapping of the staining intensity for each of the CSC markers revealed a loss of tumor cells expressing CD54, CD55, CD106, and CD117 in αCD163-dxr–treated mice (Fig. S5 G). The reduced frequency of CD54-, CD55-, CD106-, and CD117-expressing cells was subsequently confirmed by manual gating. This showed that in control mice >60% of ascitic ID8 cells expressed CSC markers, which was reduced to <20% upon depletion of resident CD163+ Tim4+ macrophages in the omentum (Fig. 8 I). Thus, the specific depletion of resident omental macrophages resulted in reduced accumulation of ascitic tumor cells with a CSC-like phenotype. The acquisition of CSC characteristics is frequently associated with EMT (Nieto et al., 2016), and our previous transcriptomic analysis of ascitic ID8 cells showed an up-regulation of EMT-associated genes (Fig. S5 F). To confirm these data, we analyzed the expression of transcription factors (TFs) known to drive either EMT or the reverse process known as mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) in ID8-A11 cells. This analysis confirmed an increased gene expression of TFs driving EMT (e.g., Zeb2), whereas TFs involved in MET were down-regulated (e.g., Gata3; Fig. S5 H). Interestingly, Gata3 alone was recently shown to be sufficient to reverse EMT and inhibit metastases in breast and colon cancer (Yan et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2017). Since EMT has been suggested to precede the acquisition of CSC characteristics, we evaluated the expression of EMT/MET regulators in ID8 cells from omentum after depletion of CD163+ Tim4+ resident macrophages. Mice were treated as described above, ID8 tumor cells were isolated from the omentum, and expression of EMT- and MET-associated TFs was analyzed. We observed a significant increase in gene expression of Gata3 in ID8 cells from omentum after depletion of resident macrophages, which was accompanied by decreased expression of Stat3, Wnt5a, andMertk (Fig. 8 J), all positive regulators of EMT and CSC phenotype.
In summary, these experiments showed that the acquisition of EMT and CSC characteristics by ID8 cells and the development of invasive disease are promoted by the presence of resident CD163+ Tim4+ macrophages in omentum.
The vast majority of cancer-related deaths are due to the development of metastatic disease. The metastatic spread of cancer can be described according to two basic models. The predominant linear model dictates a stepwise progression of primary tumors before dissemination of fully metastatic malignant cells. However, the parallel model accounts for the early dissemination of cancer cells and the formation of distant metastases that develop in parallel with the primary tumor. While there has been extensive research into the stepwise progression of primary tumors toward a metastatic phenotype, relatively little is known about the role of cells that form the premetastatic niche for disseminated cancer cells and their involvement in the metastatic spread of disease. Given that macrophages populate all adult tissues and the proven role of TAMs in promoting invasion and metastasis in experimental models (Noy and Pollard, 2014), it is likely that resident macrophages form an important component of the tissue niche for the malignant progression of disseminated cancer cells.
It had previously been assumed that TAMs are mainly monocyte derived (Lahmar et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2018), until several recent studies showed that macrophages of embryonic origin can persist in tumors from experimental models and may have distinct contributions toward tumor progression (Zhu et al., 2017; Loyher et al., 2018). However, these studies were limited by the lack of specific markers to distinguish TAM subsets on the basis of their origins and tools to specifically target these subsets. For example, Zhu et al. (2017) used parabiosis and fluorescent fate-mapping tools in a model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to identify a population of MHCIIlo TAMs of embryonic origin that were maintained independently of blood monocytes. However, to assess the contribution of these cells to tumor growth, the authors used an aggressive pan-targeting strategy combining both clodronate liposomes and CSF1 blockade to efficiently deplete all tissue-resident macrophages.
Here, we studied the origins and function of macrophage subsets in a model of metastatic ovarian cancer, using a novel intersectional transgenic approach and antibody-targeted cytotoxic liposomes to specifically deplete CD163+ macrophages. We describe how tissue-resident CD163+ macrophages in omentum play a specific role in the malignant progression of ovarian cancer and the development of invasive disease. We showed that ovarian cancer cells injected into the peritoneal cavity infiltrate the omentum in the vicinity of FALCs and in close contact with resident CD163+ macrophages. Using single cell transcriptomics, flow cytometry, and whole-mount imaging, we identified distinct subsets of CD169+ Lyve-1+ mature macrophages in omentum based on their expression of CD163 and Tim4. CD163 has been used extensively as a marker of tissue macrophages in humans, where the frequency of CD163+ TAMs shows a striking correlation with poor clinical outcome in a range of cancers (Komohara et al., 2014). Conversely, few studies have addressed the expression of Tim4 in human macrophages. Recent studies have shown that Tim4 is expressed by a range of long-lived tissue-resident macrophages in mice, including Kupffer cells (Scott et al., 2016), large peritoneal macrophages (Rosas et al., 2014), and gut and cardiac macrophages (Dick et al., 2019; De Schepper et al., 2018), and is thus emerging as a marker of tissue-resident macrophages with potential for self-renewal. When analyzing the ontogeny of CD169+ Lyve-1+ macrophages in omentum, we found that Tim4 expression alone did not distinguish long-lived cells, since Tim4+ CD163− macrophages (P4) were monocyte derived and rapidly replaced by bone marrow–derived cells. However, CD163+ Tim4+ (P1) macrophages were uniquely independent of bone marrow–derived monocytes in the adult, in both steady state and during tumor development, and at least a proportion of these cells were shown to be of embryonic origin. In contrast, CD163+ Tim4− macrophages (P2) were relatively long lived at steady state, compared with CD163-negative cells, but were quickly replaced by monocyte-derived cells after tumor initiation. Transcriptomic analysis revealed a close relationship between CD163+ P1 and P2 macrophages at steady state, but during tumor development, monocyte-derived Tim4-negative P2 macrophages significantly diverged from Tim4+ P1 cells and became more similar to short-lived CD163-negative monocyte-derived cells (P3). In fact, the phenotype of CD163+ Tim4+ resident macrophages in omentum was remarkably stable during tumor progression, suggesting that these cells maintain a level of tissue imprinting that is lost from more short-lived cells. Transcriptomic analysis of these different TAM subsets suggested functional diversification during tumor growth. Resident CD163+ Tim4+ (P1) macrophages showed a unique enrichment of pathways regulating JAK-STAT signaling, also previously linked with macrophage self-renewal (Soucie et al., 2016). However, other pathways previously associated with tumor-promoting functions, such as angiogenesis, blood vessel development, and tissue remodeling, were shared between both monocyte-derived and resident CD163+ populations (P1 and P2).
Prophylactic depletion of CD163+ macrophages, allowing recovery of monocyte-derived CD163+ Tim4− cells, revealed an important and specific role for resident CD163+ Tim4+ omental macrophages in the development of invasive disease. However, therapeutic depletion of both P1 and P2 CD163+ TAMs using cytotoxic liposomes had a major impact on both primary tumor growth and invasive disease, suggesting that monocyte-derived and tissue-resident CD163+ TAMs have distinct roles in disease progression. We recently showed that depletion of monocyte-derived CD163+ TAMs in a mouse melanoma model led to a T cell–mediated regression of tumor growth (Etzerodt et al., 2019), which may also account for the observed reduction in omental tumor burden upon depletion of monocyte-derived CD163+ macrophages in this model.
Macrophages play important roles in organogenesis and tissue remodeling (Pollard, 2009) and have been shown to affect epithelial cell plasticity and stimulate tissue stem cells (Chakrabarti et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2018). The acquisition of stem-like characteristics by cancer cells (CSCs) has been suggested to promote tumor progression and metastasis (Kreso and Dick, 2014). CSCs show increased anchorage-independent survival and high levels of resistance to chemotherapy or radiotherapy and thus have major implications for disease recurrence from disseminated tumor cells. EMT is also frequently associated with CSCs and accounts for the acquisition of migratory and invasive properties (Nieto et al., 2016). Several reports have shown that ascitic tumor cells from late-stage ovarian cancer patients show CSC-like characteristics (Lupia and Cavallaro, 2017;Bapat et al., 2005), which may explain the rapid progression of late-stage disease in these patients and the high frequency of disease recurrence. When analyzing the transcriptome of ascitic tumor cells in our model, we found a significant enrichment of pathways associated with CSCs and EMT. Interestingly, not only did the specific depletion of CD163+ Tim4+ resident macrophages in omentum decrease the formation of malignant ascites, it also reduced the frequency of CSCs among the few ascitic tumor cells that did accumulate. Analysis of tumor cells in the omentum showed that genes associated with regulation of EMT and CSCs, namely Stat3 (Abubaker et al., 2014), Wnt5a (Ford et al., 2014), and Mertk (Jung et al., 2016), were down-regulated in tumor cells when CD163+ Tim4+ macrophages were absent, whereas Gata3, a negative regulator of EMT, was up-regulated. In this regard, it is of particular interest that clustering analysis showed that CD163+ Tim4+ macrophages were enriched for genes associated with positive regulation of the JAK-STAT pathway. This included IL6, EPO, and prolactin, all of which activate STAT3 and have previously been shown to promote EMT and the acquisition of CSC characteristics in ovarian cancer (Solar et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2018; Levina et al., 2009). Future studies will elucidate the molecular basis of the dialog between tissue-resident macrophages and ovarian cancer cells leading to the up-regulation of JAK-STAT signaling. Given the conserved role of these pathways in EMT and CSCs, these axes of interaction could be relevant to other cancers associated with the dissemination of premalignant or dormant cancer cells. Of note, tissue-resident macrophages of embryonic origin also dominate the adult mammary gland in the mouse (Jäppinen et al., 2019), and recent studies have shown an important role for mammary gland macrophages in regulating the phenotype of basal stem cells (Chakrabarti et al., 2018).
In summary, our data show that tissue-resident macrophages in omentum play a specific role in the malignant progression of disseminated tumor cells and the development of invasive disease in a mouse model of metastatic ovarian cancer. These studies add significantly to our understanding of TAM heterogeneity and the specific contribution of different macrophage subsets to disease progression. The axes of interaction between tissue-resident macrophages and cancer cells could represent important new therapeutic targets, not only in ovarian cancer but also other cancers where the development of CSCs can have a disastrous impact on disease prognosis.
Materials and methods
Mouse breeding, omentectomy, and ovarian cancer model
Tg(Csf1r-LSL-HBEGFmCherry; Schreiber et al., 2013), Rosa26LSL-YFP, Cx3Cr1CreER, and Cx3C1rGFP/+ were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory. C57BL/6J mice were obtained from Janvier Labs. Ccr2−/− mice and Rosa26LSL-tdRFP mice were gifts from Bernard Malissen (Centre d’Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy [CIML], Marseille, France). Cd163iCre mice were generated from modified embryonic stem cells on a C57BL/6 background as described (Etzerodt et al., 2019). In brief, a FlpO-NeoR cassette encoding IRES-iCre was inserted in the 3′UTR of the CD163 gene using homologous recombination and used to generate chimeric mice that were subsequently crossed to Flp deleter mice to facilitate removal of NeoR cassette. Omentectomy and sham surgery were performed on mice under general anesthesia using 87.5 mg/kg ketamine and 12.5 mg/kg xylazine injected i.p. Laparotomy was performed through a 1-cm incision in the region of the stomach, and omentum was carefully removed. The abdominal wall was then closed in two layers with surgical suture. Sham surgery was performed as described above with the omentum carefully lifted before being placed back in the abdominal cavity. To mimic peritoneal spread of epithelial ovarian cancer, 106 ID8-Luc cells were injected i.p. in 500 µl of sterile PBS (pH 7.4). Tumor burden was estimated weekly by injecting mice i.p. with 100 mg/kg d-luciferin followed by in vivo bioluminescence imaging using an IVIS Spectrum imager (PerkinElmer). For visualizing infiltration of ID8-cells in omentum, ID8 cells were prelabeled with a Qtracker 705 cell labeling kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) before i.p. injections in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. For therapeutic treatment with LNPs, mice were injected with 100 µl of LNPs (1 mg/kg dxr) by retroorbital injection starting from 5 wk after i.p. injection of 106 ID8-Luc cells. For prophylactic treatment with LNPs or DT, mice were injected i.p. with either 200 µl of LNPs (1 mg/kg dxr) or 200 µl of DT (4 ng/kg) starting from 6 d before inoculation of tumor cells. All mice were euthanized at the indicated times, and peritoneal lavages and tissues were collected for cytometric analysis or imaging analysis. Briefly, 3 ml of ice-cold PBS with 2 mM EDTA, pH 8.0 was injected i.p., and after a careful massage to detach all the cells in the cavity, peritoneal fluid was collected through a 23G syringe. Tubes were weighed to determine the recovered lavage volume, and the cell density was assessed using a hemocytometer. All mice were housed at the animal facility at CIML with water and food provided ad libitum and a 12-h night/daylight cycle. All animal experiments were approved and performed in accordance with the limiting principles for using animals in testing (the three R’s: replacement, reduction, and refinement) and approved by the French Ministry of Higher Education and Research.
Genetic fate-mapping using Cx3Cr1CreER:R26-YFP mice was performed as previously described (Mossadegh-Keller et al., 2017); pregnant females were pulse-labeled at E16.5 by i.p. injection of 0.1 mg/kg tamoxifen and 0.05 mg/kg progesterone. For fate-mapping in adult tumor-bearing mice, Cx3Cr1CreER:R26-tdRFP mice were injected with 106 ID8-Luc cells i.p. and after 6 wk pulse-labeled with a single dose of 2 mg tamoxifen dissolved in 200 µl of corn oil by oral gavage. Generation of shielded chimeras was performed as previously described (Goossens et al., 2019); CD45.1 congenic mice were anesthetized with ketamine (150 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg) and placed in 6-mm-thick lead cylinders, exposing only the hind legs. With the abdominal area protected, mice were irradiated with 9 Gy and reconstituted with 107 bone marrow cells from CD45.1/.2 mice. After 5 wk, chimerism of blood leukocytes was assessed by flow cytometry.
Flow cytometry and cell sorting
Single-cell suspensions were prepared from omentum by digesting the tissue in RPMI 1640 medium with 1 mg/ml collagenase II (Sigma Aldrich), 50 µg/ml DNaseI (Roche), and 0.1% (wt/vol) BSA for 30 min at 37°C with gentle agitation. Cell suspensions were subsequently passed through a 70-µm cell strainer (BD Biosciences) and collected by centrifugation. Blood and ascitic cells harvested by peritoneal lavage were used without further processing. For RBC lysis, cell suspensions were incubated with 0.85% NH4Cl for 2 min at room temperature, collected by centrifugation, and resuspended directly in FACS buffer (1×PBS pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 3% FCS, and 0.1% NaN3). For flow cytometry, single-cell suspensions were incubated at 4°C for 10 min with 2.4G2 antibody for Fc receptor blocking followed by incubation with the specified antibodies (see Table 1 for details) for 30 min at 4°C. Prior to analysis, cells were incubated with Sytox Blue (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to discriminate dead cells and filtered through a 70-µm cell strainer. ALDH activity in tumor cells was measured using the Aldefluor kit (Stem Cell Technologies), in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, 2 × 106 cells were incubated with 5 µl of Aldefluor stock solution or 5 µl of Aldefluor stock solution in combination with 5 µl of the ALDH inhibitor diethylaminobenzaldehyde and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. ALDH activity was subsequently measured by flow cytometry relative to DEAB-treated control cells. All flow cytometry analysis was performed with either BD FACS LSR-2 or Fortessa X-20 flow cytometers, whereas cell sorting was performed with BD FACS Aria SORP. All cytometers were equipped with a 350-nm laser (BD Biosciences). Subsequent data analysis was performed using FlowJo software V10.4 for Mac (Tree Star).
Long-circulating liposomes encapsulating dxr were prepared and modified for CD163 targeting as previously described (Fritze et al., 2006; Etzerodt et al., 2012). Briefly, liposome formulations were formed using the ethanol-injection method from a mixture of hydrogenated soy L-α-phosphatidylcholine, mPEG2000-PE, and cholesterol (molar ratio of 55:40:5; Lipoid GmBH and Sigma Aldrich). Lipids were dissolved in ethanol at 65°C for 15 min followed by hydration (to 10% EtOH) for 1 h at 65°C in aqueous buffer suitable for further downstream applications. Liposomes were sized by extrusion 25 times through a 0.1-µm filter using the Avanti mini-extruder kit (Avanti Polar Lipids) and dialyzed twice against 150 mM NaCl (0.9% NaCl) with a second dialysis being done overnight at 4°C. For remote loading of dxr, lipid was hydrated in 300 mM (NH4)2HPO3. Following extrusion and dialysis, (NH4)2HPO3-containing liposomes were mixed with dxr-HCl for 30 min at 65°C at a dxr:lipid ratio of 1:5. Lipid content, drug content, and encapsulation efficiency were subsequently estimated from high-pressure size-exclusion chromatography (UV absorbance at 210 nm) using a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with an Ascentis C18 column (Sigma Aldrich). Liposome size was estimated using dynamic light scattering and the DynaPro NanoStar system (Wyatt Technology Europe GmbH). Modification of liposomes for CD163 targeting was done as described previously using the post-insertion method of the αCD163 antibody, clone 3E10B10 (Etzerodt et al., 2012; Torchilin et al., 2001).
Immunohistochemistry and whole-mount immunofluorescence imaging
Omentum was fixed in 1% formalin and either embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound for cryostat sectioning or used directly for whole-mount imaging. For histological analysis, 10-µm cryostat sections were mounted on glass slides and stained with H&E and visualized on an upright microscope equipped with a 10× objective. For whole-mount imaging, omental tissue was incubated with anti-CD163-ATTO565 (Etzerodt et al., 2013), anti-CD169-eFluor660 (Clone Ser4; eBioscience), anti-CD45.2-Alexa488 (Clone 104; Biolegend), and Tim4-Alexa647 (RMT54-4; Biolegend) in 0.1 M Tris pH 7.2, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% BSA overnight at 4°C. Nuclei were visualized with Hoechst 33342 (Sigma Aldrich). Tissue was subsequently mounted in RapiClear 1.47 for tissue clearing on glass slides with a 0.2-mm iSpacer (SunJin Lab Co.). Images were acquired on a Zeiss LSM780 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH) using spectral unmixing with a 10× or 20× objective.
Spheroid formation assay
Tumor cells in ascites were enriched by depleting leukocytes in peritoneal lavage using the CD45.2 magnisort kit (eBioscience) and seeded at 40,000 cells per well in ultra-low-attachment 96-well plates (Corning Life Science) in DMEM supplemented with 4% heat-inactivated FCS. Formation of spheroids was subsequently monitored by microscopy using an inverted microscope equipped with a 4× objective.
Single-cell tumor suspensions were prepared from mouse omentum infiltrated with epithelial cancer cells 10 wk after inoculation. Macrophages were isolated by flow-assisted cell-sorting gating on CD11b+, Linneg, F4/80+, and CD64+. Single-cell transcriptomes were generated from roughly 4,000 cells per mouse (n = 4; total of 16,510 cells after CellRanger filtering) using Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 3′ GEM kit v2 and sequenced to a depth of, on average, 45,000 reads per cell using a NovaSeq S2 flow cell. This averaged to ∼1,400 genes per cell. After sequencing, samples were processed with 10× Genomics CellRanger pipeline (version 2.1.0) using mm10 (v2.1.0) reference genome. Filtered read count matrices were analyzed with Seurat (v3.1.0) running in R (v3.6.1). Briefly, samples were normalized with SCTransform (Hafemeister and Satija, 2019; 13,886 genes retained) and subsequently filtered to remove cells with high mitochondrial read contamination (>15%), low gene detection rate indicative of low-quality cells (<200), and high gene detection rate (>4,000) or high read count (>20,000) indicative of doublets. After filtering, 16,392 cells remained. Subsequently, cells were clustered into 10 clusters using Louvain clustering (resolution = 0.5), and UMAP was used to visualize clusters (assay = “SCT,” reduction = “pca,” dims = 1:10). Cluster marks were identified by comparing each cluster to all other clusters using the default Wilcoxon Rank Sum test and the default logFC threshold (>0.25). Only genes expressed in ≥25% of cells in either the cluster or all other clusters combined were considered, and only genes up-regulated in the cluster compared with all other clusters combined were reported. The top 10 cluster markers were selected by first sorting by lowest P value and subsequently by highest fold-change. Datasets are available at the European Bioinformatics Institute under accession no. E-MTAB-8593.
Bulk RNAseq and bioinformatics analysis
Library preparation and RNAseq was performed by the GenomEast platform at Institut de Génétique et Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Strasbourg, France. Full-length cDNA was generated using a Clontech SMART-Seq v4 Ultra Low Input RNA kit (Takara Bio Europe) according to the manufacturer's instructions from 500 cells isolated by cell sorting in PBS buffer containing RNase inhibitor. cDNA was amplified with 14 cycles of PCR for cDNA amplification by Seq-Amp polymerase. 600 pg of preamplified cDNA was then used as input for Tn5 transposon tagmentation by the Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit (96 samples; Illumina) followed by 12 cycles of library amplification. Following purification with Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman-Coulter), the size and concentration of library DNA were assessed on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq4000 platform generating 50-bp reads. Samples were trimmed to remove TruSeq adapters using BBduk (Bushnell, 2014) and subsequently mapped to the mouse genome assembly version mm10 using STAR version 2.5.3a (Dobin et al., 2013) with junction annotation from Ensembl version 79 (Yates et al., 2016). Gene counts obtained directly from STAR were used in gene expression analysis with DESeq2 (Love et al., 2014) using cqn (Hansen et al., 2012) derived normalization factors. SOM clustering analysis was performed using the “kohonen” R pacakage (Wehrens and Kruisselbrink, 2018; Wehrens and Buydens, 2007), while comparative GO analysis was performed using clusterProfiler (Yu et al., 2012). Heatmaps and hierarchical clustering were generated using the One minus Pearson correlation, and PCA plots with network analysis (using Pearson correlation) to show the three nearest neighbors were generated using Qlucore Omics Explorer (Qlucore AB). Datasets are available at the European Bioinformatics Institute under accession no. E-MTAB-8140 and E-MTAB-8141.
Gene expression analysis
Total RNA was purified from sorted cell populations using the RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen), and concentration was determined using the Quant-IT RiboGreen RNA assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed with a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) followed by preamplification of genes of interest using the Fluidigm PreAmp Master Mix (Fluidigm Europe B.V.) with 25 ng of total RNA and in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Exon-spanning primers to amplify genes of interest were designed using Primer-Blast (see Table 2 for details). To increase sensitivity, genes of interest were preamplified by 12 cycles of PCR using pooled assays followed by exonuclease I treatment (New England Biolabs) to remove unincorporated primers. Final preamplified cDNA was diluted 1:5 in Tris-EDTA buffer. Gene expression analysis was performed using the Biomark HD system from Fluidigm (Fluidigm Europe B.V.) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and standard settings. Data were analyzed using the Real-Time PCR Analysis Software (Fluidigm Europe B.V.), and the resulting cycle threshold values were normalized to Ppia to obtain delta CT values.
For treatment studies, statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test. For comparison between groups, statistical testing was performed using nonparametric tests such as Mann-WhitneyU test or Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. P values are indicated as *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; and ****, P < 0.0001. All statistical analysis was performed with Graphpad Prism 7 for Mac.
Online supplemental material
Fig. S1 shows the gating strategy for macrophages in omentum. Fig. S2 shows the flow cytometric analysis of monocytic chimerism in the shielded chimera fate-mapping experiments. Fig. S3 shows a heatmap of the 5,000 most DEGs in CD169hi Lyve-1+ omental macrophages sorted at steady state (0 wk) or 5 wk and 10 wk after infiltration of ID8 ovarian cancer cells. Fig. S4 shows tumor growth inCcr2−/− mice as well as replenishment of omental and peritoneal macrophages after prophylactic depletion of CD163+ macrophages in Cd163-Csf1rDTR mice. Fig. S5 shows heatmaps of genes associated with enriched pathways in P1–P3 omental macrophages. Fig. S5 also shows the transcriptomic comparison of cultured ID8 cells with ID8 cells harvested from ascites. Table S1 lists markers associated with CSC phenotype in ovarian cancer.
We thank Bernard Malissen (CIML, Marseille, France) for Rosa26-LSL-tdRFP andCcr2−/− mice, Lionel Chasson (histology platform, CIML) for assistance with histology, and Sylvain Bigot (flow cytometry platform, CIML) for help with cell sorting. scRNAseq was carried out at the Center for Functional Genomics and Tissue Plasticity, Functional Genomics & Metabolism Research Unit, University of Southern Denmark. The authors thank Tenna P. Mortensen and Ronni Nielsen for sequencing assistance.
These studies were supported by grants to A. Etzerodt from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF14OC0008781) and to T. Lawrence from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-09-MIEN-029-01 and ANR-10-BLAN-1302-01), FP7 Ideas: European Research Council 2007–2013 grant agreement number 260753, and institutional funding from Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, and Aix Marseille Université. Microscopy facilities are supported by France Bio Imaging grant ANR-10-INBS-04-01.
Author contributions: A. Etzerodt and T. Lawrence designed the experiments. A. Etzerodt and M. Moulin performed the experiments with help from M. Delfini, M. Bajenoff, N. Mossadegh-Keller, M.H. Sieweke, S.K. Moestrup, and N. Auphan-Anezin. T.K. Doktor performed bioinformatic analysis. A. Etzerodt and T. Lawrence wrote the manuscript with comments from S.K. Moestrup, M.H. Sieweke, and N. Auphan-Anezin.
Disclosures: Dr. Etzerodt reported personal fees from Stipe Therapeutics outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.