Summary of the Theoretical Predictions for FRET for Various Distributions of Donor- and Acceptor-labeled Molecules in Membranes
Test . | . | Predictions for . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Randomly distributed molecules* . | . | Mixture of clustered and randomly distributed molecules‡ . | . | Clustered molecules§ . | ||
1. E is dependent on acceptor | yes | yes | no | |||
surface density | ||||||
2. E is dependent on donor | no‖ | no | no | |||
surface density | ||||||
3. E goes to zero at low | yes | sometimes | no | |||
surface densities | ||||||
4. E is sensitive to the donor: | no¶ | yes | yes | |||
acceptor ratio |
Test . | . | Predictions for . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Randomly distributed molecules* . | . | Mixture of clustered and randomly distributed molecules‡ . | . | Clustered molecules§ . | ||
1. E is dependent on acceptor | yes | yes | no | |||
surface density | ||||||
2. E is dependent on donor | no‖ | no | no | |||
surface density | ||||||
3. E goes to zero at low | yes | sometimes | no | |||
surface densities | ||||||
4. E is sensitive to the donor: | no¶ | yes | yes | |||
acceptor ratio |
See Appendix for a detailed discussion of each case, including any additional assumptions or limitations.
Derived from Eqs. A1 and A2 and illustrated in Fig. A2.
Derived from Eq. A5 and illustrated in Fig. A3.
Derived from Eq. A4.
In the limit where excited state donors do not compete for acceptors.
So long as the acceptor concentration is kept constant.