Table II.

Mitotic stability depends on the timing of Chl4p loss relative to introduction of centromere DNA


Plasmid

Wild type

chl4Δplasmid

Wt + plasmidchl4Δ

 
Stable(80–90%)
 
Unstable
 
Stable
 
Unstable(0.08–5%)
 
Stable(60–90%)
 
Unstable(0.08–5%)
 
pYe (CEN3) B 10/10 0/10 0/15 15/15 12/27 15/27 
pYe (CEN3) 30 10/10 0/10 0/15 15/15 20/36 16/36 
pYe (CEN3) 41
 
10/10
 
0/10
 
0/15
 
15/15
 
17/32
 
15/32
 

Plasmid

Wild type

chl4Δplasmid

Wt + plasmidchl4Δ

 
Stable(80–90%)
 
Unstable
 
Stable
 
Unstable(0.08–5%)
 
Stable(60–90%)
 
Unstable(0.08–5%)
 
pYe (CEN3) B 10/10 0/10 0/15 15/15 12/27 15/27 
pYe (CEN3) 30 10/10 0/10 0/15 15/15 20/36 16/36 
pYe (CEN3) 41
 
10/10
 
0/10
 
0/15
 
15/15
 
17/32
 
15/32
 

Centromere plasmids (pYe [CEN3] B, pYe [CEN3] 41, or pYe [CEN3] 30) were introduced into wild type and chl4Δ mutants (left and middle columns). Plasmid-bearing cells were selected, and plasmid stability was determined as described in the Materials and methods. Centromere plasmids are stably segregated (80–90%) in 30/30 wild-type cells (left column). In 45/45 chl4Δ mutants, <5% of cells contained plasmids upon nonselective growth. In the right column, cells containing the indicated centromere plasmids were transformed with chl4Δ::KANr. Mitotic stability measurements revealed heterogeneity in plasmid stability: 60–90% stability (49/95) and 0.08–5.0% stability (right column, 46/95).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal